In Google Inc. v. Visual Real Estate, Inc., IPR2014-01338, Paper 3, IPR2014-01339, Paper 3, IPR2014-01340, Paper 3, and IPR2014-01341, Paper 3 (September 2, 2014), the Board accorded the petitions a filing date, but objected to the claim charts, because each contained arguments. The Board provided some examples of these “arguments” including saying “To the extent that . . .” and “For the reasons described above . . .” and “well-known methods . . .”.