In Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, CBM2014-00112, Paper 7, and CBM2014-00112, Paper 7, (September 30, 2014), the Patent owner objected that petitioner’s filing two Petitions improperly circumvented the 80-page limit for covered business method review petitions. The Board noted that the patent owner did not cite any authority to support its position, and noted the page limit for petitions requesting covered business method patent review is 80 pages (37 C.F.R. § 42.24(a)(iii)), and each of the 112 and the 113 Petitions is within that requirement. To add insult to injure, the Board consolidated the two proceedings, presumably reducing the patent owner’s response to petitioner’s 160 pages of argument to a single 80-page response. The same thing happened in Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, CBM2014-00108, Paper 8, and CBM2014-00109, Paper 8, (September 30, 2014), decided the same day