September 3, 2014

Institution Decisions

In NeuLion, Inc. v. Cascades Ventures, Inv., IPR2014-00526, Paper 23 (September 3, 2014), the Board denied inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,156,236.

In Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00481, Paper 11 (September 3, 2014), the Board instituted Inter Partes review of claims 1, 4, 6, 10, 12–15, 17, 20, 22, 26, 28–31, 33, 35, and 37 of U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180 (all of the challenged claims).

In Intel Corporation v. Zond LLC, IPR2014-00455, Paper 12 (September 3, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–5 and 11–15 of U.S. Patent No. 7,808,184 (all of the challenged claims).

In Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00482, Paper 10 (September 3, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1, 4, 6, 10, 12–15, 17, 20, 22, 26, 28–31, 33, 35, and 37 of U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180 (all of the challenged claims).

In Intel Corporation v. Zond LLC, IPR2014-00456, Paper 12 (September 3, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of review of claims 6–10 and 16–20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,808,184 (all of the challenged claims).

In Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. iLumisys, Inc., IPR2014-00448, Paper 8 (September 3, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 8,093,823.

In Phishme, Inc. v. Chapman Technology Group, Inc., IPR2014-00531, Paper 8, (September 3, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–5, 8, 12, 13, 16, 19, 28–31, 37, and 40, of U.S. Patent No. 8,484,741 (but not challeged claims 35 and 41).

In Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. LED Tech Development, LLC, IPR2014-00590, Paper 23, (September 3, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claim 31 of U.S. Patent No. 6,095,661, after the Patent Owner disclaimed challenged claims 27, 28, 38, 42–47, and 49, and denying niter partes review of challenged claims 33, 34, 36, 37, 51, and 52.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Inter Partes Review by Bryan Wheelock. Bookmark the permalink.

About Bryan Wheelock

Education J.D., Washington University in St. Louis B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering, Duke University Bryan Wheelock's practice includes preparation and prosecution of patent and trademark applications and drafting of intellectual property agreements, including non-compete agreements. He has brought and defended lawsuits in federal and state courts relating to intellectual property and has participated in seizures of counterfeit and infringing goods. Bryan prepares and prosecutes U.S. and foreign patent applications for medical devices, mechanical and electromechanical devices, manufacturing machinery and processes, metal alloys and other materials. He also does a substantial amount of patentability searching, trademark availability searching and patent and trademark infringement studies. In addition to his practice at Harness Dickey, Bryan is an Adjunct Professor at Washington University School of Law and Washington University School of Engineering.