September 4, 2014

Posted on by

Institution Decisions

In Fiserv, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corporation, CBM2014-00087, Paper 6 (September 4, 2014), the Board instituted a covered business method review of claims 1, 2, 16, 18, 22, 25, 26, 29, 36, 38–42, 45–49, 55, 58–60, 64, 66–70, 73–75, 78, 80, 82–84, 88–91, 102, 105–110, and 114–123 of U.S. Patent No. 5,910,988, but not 3-7, 9-15, 1719-21, 23-24, 27, 30-35, 37, 43-44, 50-54, 56-56, 61-63, 65, 71-72, 76-77, 79, 81, 85-87, 92-101, 103-104, 111-123.

.In Fiserv, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corporation, CBM2014-00088, Paper 6 (September 4, 2014), the Board instituted a covered business method review of  claims 1, 2, 9, 16, 18, 19, 22, 25, 26, 29, 36, 38–43, 48, 50, 51, 54, 55, 60, 62, 63, and 66 of U.S. Patent No. 6,032,137 (but not claims 3-7, 10-15, 17, 18, 19-21, 24, 27, 30-35, 27, 44-47, 49, 52-53, 56-59, 61, 64-65).

In MasterCard International Incorporated v. D’Agostino, IPR2014-00543, Paper 8 (September 4, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–38 of U.S. Patent No. 8,036,988 (all of the challenged claims).

In MasterCard International Incorporated v. D’Agostino, IPR2014-00544, Paper 7 (September 4, 2014), the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1–30 of U.S. Patent No. 7,840,486 (all of the challenged claims).

Dispositions

In BMO Harris Bank National Association v. Stambler, CBM2014-00129, Paper (September 4, 2014), the Board terminated the covered business method review on the joint motion of the parties.

In SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Software, Inc., CBM2013-00042, Paper 42 (September 4, 2014), the Board terminated the covered business method review on the joint motion fo the parties.

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Covered Business Methods, Inter Partes Review by Bryan Wheelock. Bookmark the permalink.

About Bryan Wheelock

Education J.D., Washington University in St. Louis B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering, Duke University Bryan Wheelock's practice includes preparation and prosecution of patent and trademark applications and drafting of intellectual property agreements, including non-compete agreements. He has brought and defended lawsuits in federal and state courts relating to intellectual property and has participated in seizures of counterfeit and infringing goods. Bryan prepares and prosecutes U.S. and foreign patent applications for medical devices, mechanical and electromechanical devices, manufacturing machinery and processes, metal alloys and other materials. He also does a substantial amount of patentability searching, trademark availability searching and patent and trademark infringement studies. In addition to his practice at Harness Dickey, Bryan is an Adjunct Professor at Washington University School of Law and Washington University School of Engineering.